Major Implication for Airpower
Major Implication for Airpower
The battlespace in the air domain will be utilized in the future with the evolving modern welfare. According to White (2014), clear conceptual issues within the operations in the land domain seem to be clear; yet combating on the same is a challenge. There is need to have air combatants while maintaining proper operations on the land with the advancement in technological aspects. According to Lamberth (2000), the air domain is described as being the atmosphere that begins from the surface of the earth and extends largely to the altitude in which the operations of the main results are negligible. The different implication may be brought about by this aspect of having the dominance over air power in the region. Countries such as China and Russia that are of high competency may regard the air domain as a single region for improving their battlegrounds. The nature of the same is deemed to cause much competitive nature on the issue of air power.
One factor to consider is that the air domain is not centered on people, and thus technical solutions are affected in regards to aiding the ground individuals. Peer competitors including China and Russia have capabilities enough to contest on the matter of air domain. According to Epstein (2014), the competitors pose a large threat to the dominance of the air domain, and it is thus difficult to maintain and attain the same. In this regard, the need for cross-domain, including the land and the sea, is rising, especially because of the improved technological advancement that affects these domains.
With the rising competition for the air domain power and limited access to the land domain, the peer competitors including China and Russia pose a profound threat of ensuring that the dominance of this domain remains contested for, yet with them having the majority of the power over the same. According to Van Crefeld, (2015), the utilization of the air domain in the majority of the defensive nature will be limited to given regions depending upon the various competing agents in the given scenario. This may hence lead to increased usage of the land barriers and defense forces may be more dependent on the land as much as the same is dependent on the air.
Dependence on Land and Sea
The rising competitive nature of the peers may result in the utilization of the land and sea domains as part of the major aspects to be utilized as opposed to using the air power. According to Pape, (2014), however, the land domains are dependent on the air power since the same cannot function in a proper way that without the air power. In this regard, there increasing dependency on the land will be more pronounced especially because of the evolving technologies that may otherwise lead to proper utilization and integration with part of the air power.
In addition, the same may result in the merging of the other peer competitions in a way to combat the competitive nature of the same. According to Lamberth, (2000), the coming up with a contingency plan to ensure that the contest for dominion of the air power will be averted and hence the major planners and competitors will work together in the given aspects. In addition to the same, the competitors may thus co-involve each other with the dominion over the air power and hence improved air security in the same.
According to White (2014), there exists a difference in the levels of control of the air domain. This is primarily because of the differences in powers of the various competitive Nations including China and Russia. In this regard, the lack of one single dominance of the strength of the air domain presents a great challenge as to how the same should be maintained. However, in the future, the same may have to be controlled from a central region. The impact of this element would be positive, in that the dominion of the air region will not be contested for, but will otherwise be claimed only for utilization at given scenarios.
In addition, with the central control, the same will have proper management resulting in concrete evidence of usage and general maintenance of the same. According to White (2014), air superiority is necessary as the majority of the various activities within the air domain will be effectively controlled and maintained properly. The same implies that the security of the given air domain will hence be improved, resulting in improved efficiency in the control and air battles, which, in turn, lead to more inclusion and utilization of the land and sea domains.
Enhanced Regional Conflicts
The competitive nature of major of the superior nations such as Russia and China for the air power superiority may result in conflicts between these Countries. According to Mrozek, (2015), hunger for power is an aspect that may lead to conflicts and ultimately lead to war. This is because each of the super powers aims at having ultimate control over the air domains, disregarding the other parties in the same. Thus, this may result in feuds between these nations over the superiority in air these domains.
Alternatively, the same may enhance and catalyze the feuds that have existed between these different nations. According to Harkavy (2013), slight disagreements and disregards may cause war on various grounds for conflicts that may not have been entirely resolved between the nations. In this regard, the feuds may have to be resolved through battles and wars, owing to the fact that these firms may be competing for the air dominance. Moreover, the party with higher superiority over the given aspects may hence have enemies from regions within, thereby having to battle with them over time due to their power over the air domain.
The air domain is important to many nations, and superiority of the same means that they may have better focus and support to the ground teams especially in battle. The air power, therefore, is an aspect contested for by the major countries such as Russia and China. However, many implications including the dependence on the alternative domains including the cyberspace, the land, and the sea may be prudent owing to competition over air domain. Enhanced battles and conflicts between these nations may arise due to the competitive nature of the same, and hence there is a need for a central control of these aspects.
Epstein, J. M. (2014). Measuring Military Power: The Soviet Air Threat to Europe. Princeton University Press.
Harkavy, R. E. (2013). Great power competition for overseas bases: The geopolitics of access diplomacy. Elsevier.
Lamberth, B. (2000). The Role of Air Power Going into the 21st Century. Emerging threats, force structures, and the role of air power in Korea, 115-141. From http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF152/CF152.chap6.pdf
Mrozek, D. J. (2015). Air Power And The Ground War In Vietnam, Ideas And Actions. Pickle Partners Publishing. From http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA421692
Pape, R. A. (2014). Bombing to win: Air power and coercion in war. Cornell University Press.
Van Crefeld, M. (2015). Air Power and Maneuver Warfare. Pickle Partners Publishing.
White Jr, S. R. (2014). Futures Seminar: The United States Army in 2025 and Beyond. A Compendium of US Army War College Student Papers. Volume 1. ARMY WAR COLLEGE CARLISLE BARRACKS PA CENTER FOR STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP. From http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA615332