Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Functions of the Committee

Tim Porter-O’Grady, a health system consultant with 44 yeas of experience, defines the concept of shared governance as a model of professional preparation. Tim further aatributes some characterisics to shared governence such as accountability, ownership and collaboration. The cornerstone principles enable sustainable and responsible decisions and a cross-disciple design for worldcalss patient care (Twyfords, 2012). The primary functions the committee has are:


The committee is responsible for ensuring that nurses have a good relationship with the patients, a fair level of understanding and respect for the same that the nurses commit to the stated plan of care.


            As the nurses will be responsible for the patient care plan, the committee has to develop and organize a problem-oriented approach plan that will aid the nurses during their practice and provide measurable outcomes (Coolin, 2013).


The nursing performance should be evaluated to ascertain that the set goals are reached and check if the nurses are improving in their field of work (Coolin, 2013).

Research and Recommendations

The committee studies about trending and new ways of curing patients, the best way they can improve the services offered by nurses, how the working environment should be upgraded and other relevant information. Ansell and Gash (2011) assert that it also recommends the same to the team of nurses and staff.


Interactions of Members of the Committee

            The committee involves representatives of all the service area including emergency services, surgical services, clinical services and nursing administrators, among others. Being professionals in their fields of work, the committee members have a lot of respect for each other’s field of practice, and, therefore, their language is modest with a proper level of politeness when one needs to speak (Twyfords, 2012). For instance, when one of the committee members want’s to voice his or her opinions, he or she asks for permission first before moving on to speaking. The board members work in different fields but, at times, the cohorts must work together, and develop some level of friendship. Their interaction now becomes more friendly, and the members involved feel responsible for voicing out their views and opinions more freely (Ansell & Gash, 2011).

Decision Making

The committee arrives at its decision at the end of the meeting, having weighed all the options available. The decision made is influenced by some factors within the meeting (Twyfords, 2012). The committee listened to all the input from impacted stakeholders and the members attending the meeting and weigh the importance and urgency of the matter before giving the final decision. The practice is one of the preeminent ways to ensure that shared governance has been achieved (Twyfords, 2012). The committee members have plans aiming for the consensus of how the nurses can have better working environments.However, what shows that they have collaborative decision making is a backup plan which defines the strategy that should be used in case the agreement is not reached.

The board has a shared accountability for the nurses and patients receiving treatment in their hospital. The committee established that it is their duty to examine the services offered by the nurses as well as the patient’s response on the same so that they know what improvements they should implement to improve the image of the hospital. The decision shows that the members make their decision through shared governance.


Twyfords (2012). The Smart Leader’s Guide to Collaborative Governance

Coolin, H. (2013). Top 10 Strategic Issues for Boards, 2013–2014, from

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2011). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice


Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount