Probation and Parole
Definition of Truth in Sentencing
Truth in Sentencing refers to the law that requires all the offenders to serve their full sentence imposed on them during their hearings in courts. This is the type of law that favors the victims by ensuring that the criminals are punished fully to at least a maximum of 90% of their sentence. Truth in Sentencing law ensures that other policies that enable prisoners to serve lesser years in prison are eliminated and demolished from the prison acts in various states.
The Role of Truth in Sentencing Incentive Grants Law
Many countries come with various laws that are to be enforced within the people and achieve the objectives meant for it. According to Latessa and Smith (2015), laws are meant to bring up corrections within communities in a various states of a country. There are several goals that the Truth in Sentencing Incentives Grants law was to be accomplished by the law. The reason this law was introduced was to ensure full punished is observed by the offender involved. Thus, prisoners face the full sentence imposed on them by the court during their hearing once they are arrested.
Second, the Truth in Sentencing Incentives Grants law goal that was to be accomplished is to ensure that the policies that favored the offenders by enabling them to serve less time in prison is demolished and eliminated from any of the prisons law in a state. The introduction of this law led to the elimination of various laws that favored the offenders such as parole. It was a successful achievement for Truth in Sentencing law once the other unfavorable policies were demolished by the government of the different states that employed the use of Truth in Sentencing law according to Latessa and Smith (2015).
Movements that are linked with Truth in Sentencing Law
For a successful implementation of this favorable law to the public, Truth in Sentencing law had to link with other movements that acceptable within the state by the majority. Since Truth in Sentencing Law suggests that all offenders should serve the full sentence, then one of the movements that link with Truth in Sentencing Law is the Mandatory Sentencing. The Mandatory Sentencing on the other hand implies that there are offences that should automatically yield punishment once committed by any person. The other movement that link with Truth in Sentencing Law is the Three Strikes movement. This movement links with the Truth in Sentencing Law since it also implies that the courts within the state should extend the periods of sentence on people who have repeatedly committed the same crime in different occasions.
How Truth in Sentencing Has Changed Way of Sentencing Offenders
After the introduction of the Truth in Sentencing Law which was highly seconded by the public and different movements within the state, the way of sentencing many of the offenders in the state has changed. Some of the states even complied with the act of the Truth in Sentencing Law since it provides an opportunity for their prisons to acquire the federal grants. Most states have improved the way offenders are punished once a crime is committed by leading into a punishment that will add to at least 90% of their sentence. Some of the states that have effectively implied with the act are such as Delaware, Georgia and Virginia. The truth in Sentencing law has become acceptable to most communities that have employed the use of this law.
As reported by Sabol (2002), this law has caused some influence on the way states punish their criminals and has led to increase in prisons population over time. When the prisoners are entitled to serve the full term sentence, the population of the prison tends to increase since offenders with long period of sentence spend their time within the prisons.
Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2015). Corrections in the Community. Routledge.
Maruschak, L. M., & Parks, E. (2012). Probation and parole in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Sabol, W. J. (2002). The influences of truth-in-sentencing reforms on changes in states’ sentencing practices and prison populations.