The mind and the brain
According to Niedermeyer and Silva (2005), it can be argued that both the emotions and feelings are not entirely influenced by the health status of the brain considering that there should be tested results to anchor the claim. On the other hand, the opposite, that is, the proposal that emotions and feelings are somehow networked into the state of mind can as well be proposed with tests to back the same. Comprehending the differences as well as similarities between the brain and the mind plays a great role in identifying the mental illness that is affecting a patient, the diagnosis required and the best way to administer treatments and medication for the same (Druckman & Swets, 2014). Damasio accredits that “To say that mind originates within the brain is undeniable, but I select to qualify the declaration and reflect the details why the brain’s neurons perform in such a considerate manner.”
The mind is the exhibitions of thought, emotion, perception, memory, imagination and determination that proceeds within the brain. The term memory is frequently used to talk about the thought progressions of intention (Niedermeyer & Silva, 2005). The mind is the attentiveness of awareness humans know, the capacity to regulator what beings do, and distinguish what people are undertaking and why. In simple terms, the mind gives the ability to comprehend. The mind has made humans proficient in solving a complicated sound problem, which distinguishes people from other existing beings (Schwartz & Begley, 2003).
On the other hand, the brain can be viewed as the real and tangible household for the mind. The spirit resides within the brain, but they are not the same. The brain is the vessel whereby impulses that are electronically transmitted live and are contained (Rosenberg & Parrott, 2013). It is the responsibility of the brain to coordinate and control the motion of organs within the whole body, the activities occurring and to transmit impulses to all the parts of the body. The brain is not used in thinking, but the mind is.
Antonio Damasio explains that he has carried out such tests and found out that the latter has occurred to all his test subjects. He claims that “along two periods of experimental and clinical work with an enormous number of nerve patients have permitted me to repeat this surveillance many stretches, and crack a hint into a hypothesis that is testable (Rosenberg & Parrott, 2013).” He, however, states “the lack of feelings and emotion is no less detrimental, no less proficient of conceding the levelheadedness that makes us characteristically human and permits us to resolve in consonance with the intelligence of individual forthcoming, social resolution, and moral standards.”
The Negative Effects
Antonio Damasio demonstrates that one of the differences between the mind and the brain is that aspect identified and noted to cause variations regarding how research is conducted. He states that with the idea of Cartesian, “if the mind can be detached from the body, maybe one can try to comprehend it short of any appeal to neurochemistry, without any need to be influenced by knowledge of neurophysiology, neuroanatomy, and neurobiology (Searle, 2011). Interestingly and ironically, many cerebral experts who believe they can examine the mind without remedy to neurobiology would not deliberate themselves, dualists.” The advancement of this idea has been used to fluctuate the way of learning and treatment of these kinds of disease.
In the medicine world, this study has led to the development of different theories that provide conflicting information. Damasio claims that “the emotional concerns of diseases of the body appropriate, the alleged real illnesses, are customarily overlooked and are merely considered on subsequent thought (Damasio & Antonio, 2015). Also more deserted are the contrary, the body-proper belongings of mental conflict.” To add on this, Damasio claims that the ideas promoted by Plato were not correct. He identifies these claims and states that “Plato thought that temperature made the blood flow, and that minuscule, ever so satisfactory subdivisions of the blood purified themselves into bodily feelings, which possibly will then interchange muscles.”
The hypothesis is termed erroneous since it is now clear how and why blood flows within the human body, as well as how the brain participates in the process at large (Carter, Aldridge, Page & Parker, 2014). If this impression were to be put in practice, then the precise information would be obtained which would otherwise cause undesirable results. Regarding the so stated cases, it is hard to evaluate the base under which valid and relevant results might be obtained. The level to which it is agreeable with Damasio is relatively high.
Niedermeyer, E. & Silva, F. (2005). Electroencephalography: clinical applications, basic principles, and related fields. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Druckman, D. & Swets, J. (1988). Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
Rosenberg, A. & Parrott, W. (2013). Mind rendering to symbols: the brain discloses its secrets, what neuroscientists would like to know. Springfield, Mo: Great Spirit Pub.
Searle, J. (1991). Intentionalität : eine Abhandlung zur Philosophie des Geistes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Damasio, Antonio. (1995). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.
Carter, R., Aldridge, S., Page, M. & Parker, S. (2014). The human brain book. New York, New York: DK Publishing.
Schwartz, J. & Begley, S. (2003). The brain and the mind: Neuroplasticity and the control of cerebral force. New York: Regan Books/HarperCollins Publ.