What caused the intelligence failure of 9/11 and how can this be corrected in the future?Discuss

Construct a 10 page paper addressing the substantive issues surrounding the topic “What caused the intelligence failure of 9/11 and how can this be corrected in the future?”. You may engage resources from my course materials provided via upload.

The paper should be at least 10 pages in length, double-spaced, bibliographic content is not included in the page length. Students are required to have at least 10 sources to back up their original content. Source information should only constitute 25% of the paper. All other content must be original author work. In intelligence analysis, assessments are made and then numerous sources are used to justify trends seen to better indicate future behavior. The class is emulating that type of environment for students and prepares students for these types of analytical demands. The focus on writing original analysis and supporting claims with numerous citations (ie message traffic).

This paper should be focused around the central question “What caused the intelligence failure of 9/11 and how can this be corrected in the future?”.

The objective for the assignment is to research the topic, synthesize the information, apply noted analytical processes, and then build a recommendation that a policymaker could use in the future, with regards to the topic. Do not forget to provide the recommendation.

Generally speaking, the format should be as follows:

I. Introduction: This section should build toward and culminate with the thesis statement. The thesis statement is the basic conclusion or one-sentence argument you are forwarding in the paper.

II. Literature Review: You do not have to label the section as such. However, the second section should generally review the existing state of knowledge so the reader has a since of the background of the issue and what has been said and argued already. You should generally try to explain the major schools of thought or the major approaches or arguments that have defined the topic. Ideally, you would close with a paragraph that points out how the research, which follows in the next section, will compliment the existing state of knowledge by filling some gap, addressing some misperception, or correcting some common mistake, etc.

III. Analysis / Findings: This is the meat of the paper. This is where you set forth your argument for “what went wrong” or “what needs to be fixed.” This should include ample evidence to support the claims you are making, and this evidence should support the recommendation(s) you are making. This section is NOT simply the section where you offer your views on the previously summarized literature. Again, this should be where you lay out the evidence for your thesis.

IV. Conclusion: A very short summary of your argument and any parting comments you would like to make.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount